Joined
·
500 Posts
Hi,
I do not understand the discussion in the following thread:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=5230
and hope that someone could enlighten me. For me the most reliable source of information about mouse genetics is Jax. They have a definition of Pearl (gene code pe) as a simple autosomal recessive mutation on chromosome 13. Therefore nobody can "recreate" it by breeding, there is only yes or no: If the mouse is pe/pe it is pearl, if it is Pe/* it is not. If Jax is true, nobody can create a Pearl by simple breeding of Pe/Pe mice, not from Chinchilla or Silveragouti or what ever. Nope.
All you can get is something looking similar to a Pearl more or less. If pe is lost, it is lost until the mutation happens by chance again. Could be tomorrow or not in hundred years.
Here is the link to the Jax article:
http://www.informatics.jax.org/wksilver ... e5-7.shtml
Best regards, Roland
Chilloutarea Mousery - Tricolor , Splashed , Merle , Recessive Red
The place where science meets fun!

I do not understand the discussion in the following thread:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=5230
and hope that someone could enlighten me. For me the most reliable source of information about mouse genetics is Jax. They have a definition of Pearl (gene code pe) as a simple autosomal recessive mutation on chromosome 13. Therefore nobody can "recreate" it by breeding, there is only yes or no: If the mouse is pe/pe it is pearl, if it is Pe/* it is not. If Jax is true, nobody can create a Pearl by simple breeding of Pe/Pe mice, not from Chinchilla or Silveragouti or what ever. Nope.
All you can get is something looking similar to a Pearl more or less. If pe is lost, it is lost until the mutation happens by chance again. Could be tomorrow or not in hundred years.
Here is the link to the Jax article:
http://www.informatics.jax.org/wksilver ... e5-7.shtml
Best regards, Roland
Chilloutarea Mousery - Tricolor , Splashed , Merle , Recessive Red
The place where science meets fun!
